![junghans clock parts junghans clock parts](https://image.invaluable.com/housePhotos/theAuctionHouse/11/424411/H2447-L45421792.jpg)
![junghans clock parts junghans clock parts](https://img1.etsystatic.com/108/0/7607498/il_fullxfull.1034027935_jwu2.jpg)
I did not measure the mainsprings but the strike side spring is notably longer than the time side. There is an “S” mark on the strike side barrel cap, helpful when returning the barrels to their correct location. The movement has been serviced at least once, so far as I can determine. The movement exudes quality with solid front and back plates though lantern pinions are favoured over cut pinions. Junghans’s movements are a cut above Mauthe, Hermle, HAC, and other mass-produced German clocks made during this period, in my view. I have heard stories of Junghans clocks from this era running well despite being very worn. Early Junghans movements were robust and strong runners. Junghans time and strike movement, B11 is under the Junghans trademark Move the gong assembly aside (or take it out completely by releasing a screw on the bottom of the case) and remove the works. Open the rear access door to release two thumbscrews screws underneath the movement seat board. To remove the movement remove the hands, first the minute and then the hour hand. This refers to the approximate date of manufacture, the latter part of 1911. The movement is has a maker’s mark with B11 just below it. In any event, my plan was to service the movement. The seller says he had had the clock for two years and never had it running so I was sure it needed a good cleaning. The movement ran briefly after I got it home but after a short while refused to run despite adjustments. The Regency style veneered mahogany case of this Junghans time and strike bracket clock is in reasonably good shape save for a small piece of veneer missing on the front right corner and replacement chrome feet which look decidedly out of place. I posted the first lookat this clock a while back.
Then againFor instance, that case core looks rather squatty to me for the mvmt and dial. Yet short of writing the Stadtmuseum (see the "Find" files) you can find opinion aplenty. The marks on J movements aren't proper "hallmarks" which allow one to date where and when something was made with reference to some validated listings. Especially with basic *case* styles which were made for well over a half century in all sorts of variations. Still, without the runs it would be foolhardy to say that J didn't make something. There are of course bits and extracts of catalogues which have been reprinted here and there. The only complete historical catalogue runs that I'm aware of,as well as the actual proto-models of historical Junghans movements, are conserved in the Stadtmuseum Schramberg. Similarly, to the best of my knowledge, there are no publicly available listings of from when to when which J movements were made in which variations, or which kin-novements (say those once HAU's or Becker's etc.) were taken over, or with which codes, and so on.
![junghans clock parts junghans clock parts](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/7QwAAOSwhrRfvtbP/s-l300.jpg)
#JUNGHANS CLOCK PARTS SERIES#
Which by the way is even more clocks than Stones' concerts! Yet there are no complete catalogues for any single year, let alone complete series of catalogues for all those years and all those clocks, publicly available. According to Neher in his "official" 1961 history, Junghans turned out "far more than 150 million" clocks between 18. Greetings Chris - There's a fundamental problem with identifying and dating Junghans clocks.